|
Originally, or back in the Garden of Eden, human beings were non-violent and therefore
did not kill animals for food and clothing.
And now-a-days there are a growing number of Christians whose hearts have been softened
by the Spirit so that they are now NATURALLY
non-violent and therefore believe that killing animals for food and clothing is wrong and
should be outlawed. I am one of those soft
hearted Christians, we believe in a vegetarian Garden of Eden diet, after all, the
scriptures, as well as the Catholic Church, teach
that Jesus came to restore creation to its non-violent original condition, the Word of
God says: "the lion shall eat straw like
the ox". For those of us whose hearts have been softened it's a natural human
behavior to be kind to animals, however the elite are
still opposed to the extent of our kindness to animals. The elite of the Catholic Church
teach that animals do not have rights and
that there is nothing wrong with eating meat, even when there is available an abundance
of other kinds of food to eat. Because the
elite of the Catholic Church once claimed that indigenous people did not have basic human
RIGHTS, and also because they still have
not revoked the Papal Bulls that denied them their RIGHTS, it's therefore against
reason, an essential component of a good moral
conscience, for we non-elite Catholics, to put blind trust in our church's elite
hierarchy (as most Catholics do) - when they teach
that "animals do not have RIGHTS", they have a right not to be killed and eaten, nor have
their skins used for clothing.
On EWTN, the U.S. Catholic Church's television station, the
commentator of a weekly program called Christians who are soft-hearted
and are therefore NATURALLY opposed to not only the legalization of the killing of animals
for food and clothing, but also opposed
to the legalization of products that are addictive and harmful, such as alcohol, tobacco
and gambling, the "NEW PURITANS". However,
he stated that because of our positions on these moral issues we are therefore opposed to
"freedom". In respect to these moral issues,
I believe that he, as well as most modern-day Christians, including most of the Western
nations' elite, are confusing "freedom" with
sinful hard-hearted hedonism.
|